The
Saga of Satyendra Dubey
Shabnam
Minwalla, A Senior Journalist
On the last Sunday of November, newspaper readers in the country
woke up to a six-column headline and a dismal sense of deja vu.
`Whistle-blower
said don't name me. Govt did. He was shot dead' told a shocking
tale. But although the details were new, the essence was familiarrecounting
the hopeless struggle of an individual against a venal,all-powerful
system. And although Bollywood gives its gun-toting vigilantes
a fighting chance, most of us know that reality is much more dismissive
of lone crusaders.
Despite the appalled reactions--everything ranging from the predictable
`This country is really going to the dogs' to the resigned `There
is no way out of this mess'the story seemed headed for the attic
like so many others of its ilk. Except that the Indian Express
decided to follow up on its exclusive and managed to uncover even
more horrific details. And that IITians around the world came
together to voice their anger over the plight of their Institute-mate.
Indeed, the murder of Satyendra Dubey seemed to break through
the wall of apathy and force people to speak up.
Behind the death of the thin, bespectacled engineer on November
27, 2003, lies the story of a remarkable life. Born in Shahpur
village in Bihar, five kilometers from the nearest telephone pole,
Satyendra was the son of a clerk in a sugar factory. He topped
his village school in the Std X exams and is famous as its only
alumnus to have gained admission in an IIT. The earnest youngster
got into the Department of Civil Engineering at IIT (Kanpur) in
1990 and, despite initial problems with language and grades he
graduated with excellent marks.
Although an array of glittering tomorrowsanything from a scholarship
at an American university to a high-paying private sector job
in an Indian metrobeckoned, Satyendra opted to work for "his
country". So in 1996 he joined the Ministry of Surface Transport
as an Assistant Executive Engineer.
Of course, cynics could well have sneered that this was the most
lucrative option of them all. But Satyendra proved them wrong
four years later when he angrily turned down his first cash-stuffed
envelopeand with that the opportunity to spruce up his parents'
humble, hay-strewn house, buy a few gadgets for himself, and sweeten
life for his six siblings. It was, however, after he was put in
charge of a 60-km, 450-crore stretch of the Golden Quadrilateral
Project that he encountered full-blown, institutionalised corruption.
Soon after his transfer to Koderma in June 2002, Satyendra realised
just how deep the rot had spreadand just how much dross was being
foisted on the country in the name of the Golden Quadrilateral.
He happened upon sloppy project reports, contracts awarded on
the basis of forged documents, huge advances doled out to contractors
and rampant subletting to petty contractors who lacked the technical
ability to work on this mega-project. And everybody, from government
engineers to MNC construction companies to local thugs seemed
involved in what he described as a "loot of public money".
Like so many of us who consider ourselves honest and superior,
Satyendra could well have satisfied his conscience by refusing
to participate in the corrupt activities. But the 31-year-old
felt compelled to go one step further and tackle the mess. On
November 11, 2002 he sent a letter to the Prime Minister, describing
the nightmarish turn that this dream project had taken.
Of course, Satyendra realised he was challenging dangerous elements--but
he understood the functioning of government well enough to know
that an unsigned letter would go straight into the waste bin.
So putting his life and faith in the hands of the PMO, he attached
his name on a separate sheet of paper and requested that his identity
be kept a secret.
That this faith was misplaced soon became apparent. The PMO didn't
bother either to investigate the charges of corruption or to protect
the identity of its courageous informant. Indeed, Satyendra's
letter yielded only negative results--threats from those he had
complained against and a reprimand from his bosses at NHAI for
writing to the PM. For in an act of murderous negligence, the
PMO handed over both the letter and the sheet with Satyendra's
particulars to the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways. There,
at least eight officials scanned it before passing it on to the
National Highway Authority of India. Which was why it was hardly
surprising that the informant's identity was leaked to the culpable
contractors and officials in Koderma.
Little wonder then that lots of feathers were ruffled and financial
interests threatened when it transpired that Satyendrawho had
meanwhile been transferred to Gaya in Biharwas to return to Koderma
as one of the big bosses. As project director he would be in charge
of releasing funds for an extensive swathe of the under-construction
highway. And someone decided that there was just too much to lose.
At 3am on November 27, 2003, Satyendra arrived at the Gaya railway
station from a trip, only to find that his car was nowhere in
sight. Upon calling home and finding that the Tata Sumo had encountered
starting trouble (possibly a sabotage), he decided to take a rickshaw.
Somewhere along the way he was shot dead by unidentified assailants.
As is routinely the case with such inconvenient investigations,
it's very likely that this murder case would have been relegated
to the dump of unsolved cases in Bihar. Except that something
about this story touched a chord of indignation in the country.
Perhaps it was the fact that Satyendra was a golden boy from IIT;
perhaps it was the heartbreaking photograph of his parents in
their bare, impoverished house; perhaps it was the initial indifference
of the PMO which excused itself by saying, "Numerous letters
come in everyday.."
The outcome of that collective anger is remarkable: almost 50,000
citizens have signed a petition demanding action from the government,
the media is closely monitoring the twists and turns taken by
an increasingly bizarre investigation. The PMO and the Government
went into an extensive coverup mode after nine days. Most heartening
is the widespread outpouring of support and sorrow from a cross-section
of society. "Make all those rascal contractors sleep on the
road next to each other and run them over by a roadroller,"
wrote an agitated individual to the Indian Express last month,
voicing a common sentiment. Concurred another, "Every official
who signed that letter and refused to act should be sacked. The
PMO must be made to apologise publicly."
Indeed, it is important to punish the guiltynot only those shadowy
individuals who pulled the trigger but also the officials who,
while ignoring his request for confidentiality and passing around
his letter, virtually signed Satyendra's death warrant. But while
we demand accountability from others, we also need to acknowledge
our own responsibility, to understand that everytime we remain
silent when a friend slips a fifty to a hawaldar or brags about
pataoing a customs officer, we are contributing to the forces
that killed Satyendra.
In a country starved of icons, Satyendra Dubey stands for much
more than impressive batting figures or silver-screen charm, he
stands for the realisation that every individual has a role to
play in the battle against corruption. As one letter-writer pointed
out, "If we do nothing beyond writing a few angry letters
to the media or the PMO, the deeply-entrenched mafia will be back
in a short while. It is time we united and did something more
concrete." This realisation can achieve much more than avenging
a single deathit can save lives of the Satyendras of tomorrow.
Epilogue
by shailesh : The case was taken over by the CBI from the Bihar
police. They took custody of the rickshaw puller Pradeep Kumar,
who had reportedly witnessed the murder and took him to Delhi.
It was declared that Satyendra was killed by robbers. Pradeep
Kumar was seen around the CBI office for about two weeks. After
that he is reported missing.
The CBI also took two people for questioning Mukendra Paswan
and Sheonath Saha. They have died of poisoning. All of this
happened by end of January, 2004.
Dhananjay Dube (Satyendra's younger brother) lamented after
this; " I read the complete news about the two suicides.........Now
any hope that was there for justice has vanished......Really
no hope left..... "
There has been no investigation into the corruption charges
detailed by Satyendra Dubey.
 |
Born
on 11th of March, 1973 in Shahpur village in Siwan district
of Bihar about 15 kilometers from the birthplace of Dr Rajendra
Prasad, first president of independent India.
Father: Sh Bageshwari Dubey, a clerk in the nearby Sugar
factory earning a small salary.
Mother: Smt Lalmati Dubey, housewife. |
Brother:
Dhananjay, doing B. Tech. from Institute of Technology, Banaras
Hindu University.
Sisters: 5 sisters. Two sisters Suman and Manju who are elder
to him are married. One younger sister Pushpa is also married.
Two younger sisters Kusum and Bebi are doing their graduation
from Delhi University. |
|
|